The Power of Population Reports
Posted by Jeff Garrett on 4/11/2019
Decades ago, collectors and dealers relied on standard numismatic references, such as the Guide Book of United States Coins (the Red Book), for much of their information. Most of today’s collectors take the massive amount of numismatic information they have at their fingertips for granted.
With a few clicks of your smartphone, you can know more about a coin than most experts of the past. There is an amazing set of tools available for collectors and dealers to use when making a purchase decision.
One of the most important tools for today’s collectors is the grading census of coins that have been certified since the inception of third-party grading. These are known as the “population reports” among most users. It is hard to overstate the importance and impact of "pop reports" in numismatics. For many buyers, it is one of the first things they check.
Since NGC was founded in 1987, they have certified over 43,000,000 coins. The NGC Census details each series, and how they have graded every coin submitted since 1987. This is an amazing store of vital information about coin rarity.
|NGC population report for Morgan Dollars.|
Over the last three decades, the true rarity, or lack of rarity, has been revealed by the population reports. In general, common date Morgan Dollars are much more common than collectors and dealers thought 30 years ago. NGC has graded nearly 3.5 million Morgan Silver dollars over the years. Rare date Morgans are another story, as the true rarity of many of these was confirmed by three decades of submissions. As an example:
- 1881-S Morgan Dollar NGC MS 65 (56,305 graded)
- 1884-S Morgan Dollar NGC MS 65 (2 graded)
A student of numismatics can gain an amazing amount of knowledge about the rarity of the series they have chosen to collect by carefully studying pop reports. Before third-party grading, the best barometer of rarity was the study of auction records. David Akers’ groundbreaking books on United States gold coins that were published in the 1970s and 1980s noted auction records for different grades. For the first time, many collectors were enlightened on the true rarity of many United States gold coins. The standard references of the day all had prices for coins that did not exist in Mint State.
The pop reports are carefully studied now by those who compose pricing for a multitude of price guides. The value of a coin is greatly impacted by the information gained by checking on how many have been graded. This is a moving target, as thousands more coins are graded by NGC daily. The number and pace of rare coins being graded has been a huge factor over the years.
When third-party grading began in the 1980s, lots of coins had low population numbers and seemed very rare. This was one of the factors that attracted Wall Street money in the late 1980s and early 1990s. As third-party grading took a firm hold and millions of coins flooded in for grading, populations jumped sharply. This led to the rare coin crash of the early 1990s. For amusement, check a Greysheet from 1989 and look at classic United Commemorative prices. Coins that traded for $5,000 in 1989 can now list for under $250.
There are many anomalies that can be found in the population reports for United States coins. One of the more confusing situations is when the number of coins graded exceeds the stated mintage. This is not uncommon with many rare Proof United States gold coins. One explanation is that the mintage figures for some United States coins is incorrect. In the 1870s and 1880s, it is known that US Mint officials struck extra coins as collector demand dictated. More about this fascinating subject can found in the excellent books about Proof United States coins that have just been published by John Dannreuther.
A much more common explanation for strangely high population numbers are resubmissions. Over the decades there have been dozens of incredibly talented rare coin dealers who attempted to make a living by resubmitting coins. Some have been quite successful, while others have not. The subject of resubmissions is complicated, and may be the subject of a future article soon.
|You can help keep population reports up-to-date by sending any labels removed from their holders into the grading service.|
One of the consequences of resubmissions is that many rare coins dealers do not return the labels so that the rare coin census can by updated. There have been attempts to financially entice submitters to return labels over the years with mixed results. Some dealers are just too lazy or disorganized to send back labels once coins have been broken out and resubmitted. As can be imagined, this can greatly skew population numbers. For some “top pop” issues, this can have a dire financial impact.
One rare coin dealer told me years ago that he did not return labels because he wanted to be the only one who knew the true rarity of a certain coin. Thankfully, that is the exception, as most rare coin dealers know that numismatic transparency is important for the market to operate efficiently.
Because labels are returned to the third-party grading services on a regular basis, the population numbers actually decrease occasionally. A dealer might save labels for years (not uncommon) and then send them to NGC for updating the census.
Serious collectors should check population reports on a regular basis. Much can be gleaned from these reports that can have a serious impact on your collection. As mentioned in my last article, there has been an influx of United States gold coins into the country over the last several years. Hoards and coin finds might quietly enter the market, but they eventually are revealed in the population numbers. Last year, at least one roll (50 coins) of 1909-S VDB Cents, entered the market. The coins were amazing, and the number of coins at the top end of the grading reports increased dramatically.
Population reports are also very carefully watched by those who participate actively in Registry collecting. The population numbers are vital to those trying to assemble the top set of any series. When a new ‘finest known” coin is graded, the grading census reports the information, and the status of someone’s set could be impacted.
In my opinion, the creation of grading population reports has been one of the most important advances in numismatic knowledge. Collectors and dealers would be lost without them. The hobby is fortunate that NGC and others spend the money needed to maintain this vital pool of information. Collectors should spend time going over the census for coins they collect – it will be time well spent!
This important information and disclaimer about the grading census is found on the NGC website:
The utilization of this report as a tool for assessing the population and value of certified numismatic coins in any character or grade is unreliable. The following characteristics inherent in the marketplace undermine the accuracy of this report:
Inexpensive coins which are not generally submitted for certification may appear scarce but are not.
Numismatic coin certification services are predominantly utilized for higher grade coins.
Certified coins are often removed from their holders without notice to the grading service. Therefore, computer tallies utilized to provide population reports may be misleading.
Rarity is only one factor which must be weighed in determining the market value of a numismatic coin.
Numismatic Guaranty Corporation of America encourages all coin collectors to seek the counsel of qualified numismatists familiar with the certified coin marketplace before making any purchase based on this report.
Want to see more articles like this? Subscribe to the free NGC Weekly Market Report.