kellyt

That’s pretty neat. I’ll look into it. Thanks!

Gotcha. I still only have pictures. When it comes back I can get a better look again. I appreciate the comments.

Most def. that’s the first thing I’m gonna do when I get it back and go from there. Thanks for the reminder! I didn’t see the mint error fee on the invoice. But it’s in the total. Because that’s what it added up to on the first digital one. Like where you fill out all the requests and stuff. I’ll look again though. They just sent the invoice tonight. Not complaining. I was just thinking it would all be documented even down to them weighing it as proof. But it could still be post damage and weigh different. So weight difference wouldn’t matter much if they determined it wasn’t an error. However for my own curiosity I am going to look more into it and take in all the input and get some learning in. There may be more paper work and invoice stuff in the return.

Hey thanks! Maybe they put a personal letter in the return shipping! Haha. But yeah, I sent it in with a mint error fee. Maybe it’ll state that it went through that too and not just sent back because it looked messed up. I trust it did, but physically seeing them say it would be nice and why. I do want to look more into it. The metal in the other wrong Planchets did center and did not oblong. The metal also did go past what an sba boundary would be. I respect the decision. It’s just interesting too. Makes me want to see the edges of those other p coins. If they were similar to mine. I don’t have as much experience as those working at the grading companies but I am curious. I’ve learned a lot from the comments here and they are appreciated!

Sad day on the home front. It was determined to be not suitable for grading. I appreciate the input, it’s been fun and has given me insight. I respect the decision. I’m curious to how the edges look to the 1979 p and 1980 p wrong Planchet sba coins now though. It’s a learning process.

I’m not saying it is an official wrong planchet, just hoping a whole lot it is. But I agree with your analysis. I went back and looked up more examples. Seems there is an NGC 1979 similar to the other PCgs example I posted. (As much as I looked seems I would have seen the multiple versions already). I’ll post it here. It is cut off in the same areas as well. They both look to be from the Philadelphia mint too. Just noticing that. The one I sent is a 1981 P I believe. So maybe they all got put through the same machine. The only one that wasn’t a vertical press. Or they didn’t have those same presses there. I tried to find a quick vertical press example but couldn’t. You explained this well in your post, how the metal could have flowed out a bit filled the empty areas. Maybe that is what happened to some degree. The metal extended out from the SBA’s diameter boundary due to pressure. And it only went so far out. Why it did not form some oblong shape I don’t know. That is if the 1981 p is like these 1979 examples, a wrong planchet.

I’m hoping your theory is right, the combo of the two. While waiting for it to go through the rounds I looked up examples. The only one that comes close was a 1979 Kennedy on an sba Planchet. It was an almost dead ringer. I’ll find the pic and post it… okay I think this is the one I saw. It also has the “trust” cut off and surrounding letters at the border kind of choppy. I suppose different circumstances can cause the same effect. But it helps me hope harder, haha. Wish I’d had a scale working so I knew the weight! (It’s a screenshot and I left in the obvious proof it’s a screen shot so it doesn’t look like I’m stealing the pic. Just an example)

I hope he is right as well. And I hope the price of silver goes up, but not before I can get some more ounces!

It made it past the status of received, scheduled for grading, and this week it has been in the grading phase. I’m hoping it’s an actual error and not post damage. It looks similar to the 1979 wrong Planchet coin so maybe it is. i edited out the ID number but this is the status…

I’ve come across Kennedy halves with no FG. I know there’s big debate on what constitutes a no fg. I have a 30x loop, with it I can make out where something use to be or something that could have been. But can’t tell if it’s fg. That being said, I doubt a 5x can make it out. If any knowledge on that please share. Okay so here’s my main question how do you tell if it’s a mint error or if it’s because it’s over cleaned. Like acid washed it off or ate the fg up. (Sry this is so long, but trying to tell if a coin is cleaned or not as well) I’ve come across a few coins with a ghosting ring around Kennedy’s head. The five no fg’s I’ve ran up on have had it. I’ll show pics of two I have now. Is this a sign it has been cleaned which could be evidence it’s a fake or accidental no fg or does this sometimes happen with dies that have been messed with or polished too much? (Edit: found same ring around the 1976 hall and the “e” and “h” missing. Pics of it at bottom)

Hobby lobby has gloves in their coin collection section for hobbyists. With those wear gloves. They will immediately begin to get a slight tone compared with an untouched one. I have some gloves but I honestly don’t take my own advice on it much myself with coins but with silver eagles I don’t touch them any more. Always gloves on those especially since they are an investment. They get a hint of yellow right away and compared to an untouched one the difference is noticeable to the naked eye.

Okay I’m feeling kinda lazy this morning but evidently super curious about this. Going back through the ones I set aside the first 10 or so are all P mint. (The lazy over road the curious and I stopped) Different dates. Bare with me. It looks like it may be what they call the ring of death only a portion of it. When I looked at the ring of death coins, the first one had the ring pass through the “LAR” I bit higher but another did not. So maybe the P mint’s ring of death reaches low on the “LAR”. And this is what I get when it’s just a portion of death.

The grease may make more since. They’d all have to be positioned the same. I’m gonna see how many I already put in the jar. I started sitting them aside when I became aware of them. I’m going to see if the mint marks are different.

True, I just also thought maybe it’s where people hold it to look at it. But people usually look at the front more and it being on the back bottom right side of the coin is odd. But maybe not cause the coin is flipped. Back and front are lined up opposite to one another right. When head is up the eagle is down, when the eagle is up the head is down right? I’m gonna have to get one in my hand here in a second to see.

I’m not sure it’s post. Thinking on it now. The coins have the same spot rubbed. Every time a coin from 83, 79, 71, etc was put into someone’s coin machine or pinched into something they’d alll have to be put in at the exact same angle and position. I just started going through my second 500 dollar box and I’ve already come across many. The first box I didn’t pay much attention to it because I’ve been looking more in detail now. But toward the end of my first box I started noticing them.