Jonescoins

👍☕️😀.

GM 🌞.I came across these nice looking 1960D /small /large.tell me what you guys think, Because when I think it's something it always wrong lol.so I will wait an hear from you guys an thanks for all your help and replys

GM 🌞.I was just checking over Lincoln cent.when I noticed that Lincoln head , which is coming through the memorial building clearly and his now tie can be seen at the edge of the left side bottom corner building.didnt want to post a pic yet.sorry just wanted to make sure their clear picture,Also because of a heavy over working die clash.that also caused a bad die lamination break, causing old coinage to clash with the new over worked die.if I'm even saying right lol.anyway . even the coin planchet looks off almost like a reddish brick color.i didn't want to be rude,so I only placed what I find oddly strange.note the date and mint mark what do you guys think.? Well have a good day

No problem 👍 thank you! 

GM 🌞. to all . first my apologies to Just Bob.i just wanted to learn when things apply and why and how not in some matters.the surface of the coin has risen, to which as some of swelling causing the date to have appearance of a large date to me my opinion.because of old coinage, that in this case causing the PM Damaged.looking at the 2 .where just as the 2 curving, leftovers of coinage breakage4 minute rule to make it look wider but it's not if you look in between the two willikers you receive that's another piece of metal or debris causing that affect.yes could be a large date! However it's still would be a error? Asking do they ✋ punched dates? Because it's very odd how they can clean and polished so called coinage.well I'm sure these pictures will show I meant no harm.just wasn't seeing what you wanted to see.so am I just seeing where they tried clearing what look like 1788;) which is why the raise of the surface from the old coinage.which has changed or caused broken Post and pmd .that's my opinion

Please sir.i didn't say that to offend you at all .

13 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

Compare your coin to these pictures,and you will see that yours is a large date: (notice the curve of the "2" and the distance from its base to the coin's rim)

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

Compare your coin to these pictures,and you will see that yours is a large date: (notice the curve of the "2" and the distance from its base to the coin's rim)

 

 

No disrespect Just Bob.that don't do not look anything what I have

So now it's like trying to tell me that dates are ✋ punched to? Because I'm trying to understand how when broken Post work with somethings and not others? That's all guys not fighting or arguing with you.i really want to know

So yes I seen that many times.im asking when do it matter,why or how do it matter in cases such as such? You see clearly that 2 is covered by a 3 .or is there D/S .so what's going on with my date here ? 

16 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

All I see is a 1982 D Large Date. What else am I supposed to be looking for?

Ok let's say if it is a large date! Mind you that there is a 3 clearly visible, which will give it the large date appearance .or I guess you going to say that don't matter

I'm glad you said that.because now a question would tell what matters and when it matter! I the second part of pictures the second photo,tell me that carry no weight of how  the 3 looks more on top of the 2 ? An large date came out with a small 2 date in it? Because what I was taught and learned by some of you.to tell the difference by that 2 .so I'm here to be corrected.

Now let me see if I'm saying it 😂 right.on the date of 1982.note .the post broken during die compression, even the polished 3 has welded around the 2 which caused the bend and twist a deform2..on the bottom right handed of the D you can see the detail of the S of the mint mark.oh one 👌 thing. As you can see how the 8 looks a little wider? Well if you take focus on the date 1982.in the 8 which was cleaned up and polished,so that the old coinage couldn't show up.well as you can see it left traces of the old 3 . that is why the 8 seems somewhat wider.

You pick it;) 1982 D or 1982/83 d/s

Yes I believe I came across something very rare.let me know what you guys think about it please.i have more better picture, thank you to the lady Karen,👍 .so I'm waiting to really reveal some pictures of this Rare 1982D/S oh yes small copper date or should I wait an show a 1933

Thank you 😊👍 an to all a blessed day

No sir! I picked it because I thought it was close to the pictures,of the#1one doubled die 1966 fs .101

Ok😞👍

My apologies it was a misprint of 1972 it was a 1962 no mm

I'm trying to take better pictures 😞

Hey guys just wanted to see what you think of these Lincoln cents.one 1962D and one 1972 no mint mark,as well with one nice 1966 no mint mark.i don't want to say what I see.i get more from information of what other people see, so that I'm not just saying dumb things.i do appreciate all reply.thank you

Ok thank you 😊👍

GM 🌞 to all.well I have this 1944 D cent,I would like to get others opinion on what they think and see in this 1944D . with amazing character.;) It's a lot going on around the date and mint mark.a number is clearly visible under the last 4 in the date .let me know what you guys think.be safe and enjoy your day

Thank you 😊👍

I'm hoping that these pictures are better.