Jaynh

I think it’s double struck / multiple strikes? Your help and thoughts would be appreciated

4 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

It can't be both types, it has to be one or the other and your coin is neither.

Ok

10 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

I don't think so. It looks close to a Type 2 but is slightly different

 Could it be a type one and type two ?

Is this 1944 D/S penny. Thank you all for your time

11 minutes ago, Dukemnm said:

I don't think it was trying to form another design. The scratches are way deep to be anything with the minting process. It looks like someone was trying to clean, was frustrated or trying to make a fake error coin of some sort. it is really badly damaged. 

Ok thank you dukemnm

I was just wondering if this Penny could be scratched from the Planchet?. Because it kind a looks like it was trying to form another design

11 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

Not that I'm aware of. And even if by some fluke it was struck on an earlier Canadian 3.2g copper planchet, how would you be able to tell the difference once it has been struck.

 

I did see it somewhere I just can’t remember where. Me myself I don’t know how to tell the difference But someone will

44 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

No, why would you ask? a Canadian 1982 cent planchet weight was 2.5g

Yes I know that’s the year they changed the Reduce the weight. I though that there was an Plancha error in the 80’s US and Canadian 

Is there a US 1982 penny on a Canadian 3.2 g  planchet

50 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

That's a 1982 Large Date but hard to see any doubling from those pictures. Can you take a close-up of the area you think is doubled.

 

Thank you for your time 

Hey guys. I have a 1982 penny 3.2 Grams Looks funny to me Is it a double die I would appreciate any help.

10 minutes ago, Greenstang said:

What do you see as an error?

All I can see is some zinc rot and environmental toning.

Looks like there's letters under the date 

3 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

Looks like a "2."

Look good

On April 29, 2019 at 9:47 PM, Mohawk said:

Well....from what I can see that is just a regular old 1988 cent that has heavy zinc rot and corrosion.

Thank you

13 minutes ago, JKK said:

I thought about this, and I think it's a 58. The strike is quite good, though not full, so one doesn't expect a full head or shield; there would be light flatness. However, I think what I see is a combination of light flatness on the very high points and light rub: the face, the shield where one or two studs are missing, possibly the drapery and hip. What is clear is that any wear is very minimal. In hand I would be able to assess this better, but as we have it, 58 is my guess. Nice SLQ.

Thank you .

14 minutes ago, Jason Abshier said:

I’d shoot for AU53 or AU55 grade ... still a beautiful coin! My grandfather was a huge collector of Standing liberty quarters back in the days when I was a kid it was one of his favorite series to collect ... 

Thank you.  1 of my favorite series too.

22 minutes ago, Mohawk said:

Hello again,

I'd say that your coin has some environmental damage as a result of 54 years of circulation.  While the nickel in the outer clad layers of clad coins is some really tough metal, the copper is very reactive and prone to corrosion and other types of chemical damage.

Thank you again.