• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Double sided shield nickel
0

9 posts in this topic

This letter seems to describe a double sided shield nickel. I've found no follow-up letter and was wondering if a member might have some thoughts on this.

18890226 Nickel with both sides identical_Page_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RWB said:

A follow-up letter of March 10 reveals that the nickel has a seam along the edge, hence, a glue job of two ground down coins.

Nothing else to see here --- move along, folks.

;)

One of those trick nickles.  First time I ever saw one of those, before I knew better, I thought it was some kind of mint error. Thought they accidentally put 2 obverse dies in mistakenly. Then found out how they was made and how the dies were made and found out its a fake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then, as now, there are "experts" hiding under every rock and decaying leaf. Most mean well but don't know enough to be credible; others, however are malicious or perpetual liars who enjoy seeing others suffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "experts" mentioned in Mr. Gibson's letter were likely of similar types we encounter even today. These are what I call the "Looks Like" experts. Back in 1889 it was "It looks like a genuine nickel," today this type says "Looks like a branch mint proof." In both instances there was not enough background knowledge for the "expert" to make a meaningful assessment, but the "expert" didn't understand this.

In the 1889 reply, a mint officer suggested looking at the edge for a soldered seam, along with weight, diameter and ring. (Nickels didn't have much of a ring, but a glue or solder job would simply go "thud.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2021 at 2:42 PM, Moxie15 said:

wonder who the expert was who pronounced it genuine.

This was in 1889.   Today after more than a century, and a lot more and better numismatic literature has been published, your average dealer (expert) still can't properly identify errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0