• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

NGC Star vs. NGC Plus
2 2

37 posts in this topic

Been thinking about this question for some time and I will start by saying that I have been a fan of the NGC star designation for years(check my sets if you don't believe me!).  Unfortunately, I think that the plus grading system has hurt the value of the star.  Points are the same in the registry for a star coin, which is designated for exceptional eye appeal.  The plus is upper ends of the respective grade.  What are your thoughts???  Which would you rather have a "+" or a "*"?  Riding the fence with this dime that has both the plus and star designation...

 

1900.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the "Star" is great for eye appeal but I think that if I had the choice I would go for the "Plus" as it represents a coin that is just a little better than the grade assigned. Or they could keep the Star and go for 1/2 grades. Lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MarkFeld said:

I’d definitely decide which I’d prefer on a coin by coin basis. There are plenty of star coins and plus coins that I don’t like, as well as plenty of both that I think are great.

Good point - but considering the coin's are both equally appealing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen stars on single side cameo coins. I think some are for color. Any other biggies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, VKurtB said:

I have seen stars on single side cameo coins. I think some are for color. Any other biggies?

Here are some additional characteristics that appear to earn stars: One sided PL coins, cameos that just miss deep cameo, coins that are semi-PL on each side, but which miss the PL designation, exceptionally lustrous/flashy examples.

Edited by MarkFeld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stars are scarcer (I own 4 times as many pluses as stars) and more eye appealing.

So, if base grades are the same, as an example:

I would choose a MS 65 * over an MS 65+ anytime.  

Edited by Walkerfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bsshog40 said:

This is the one and only Star that I have. 

 

1959WashingtonNGCPF67CameoStar.jpg

That'n must be juuuuust shy of UC, then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zebo said:

Good point - but considering the coin's are both equally appealing?

I have a hard time believing that I wouldn’t be able to determine that one was more appealing to me than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, VKurtB said:

That'n must be juuuuust shy of UC, then.

That would be by far, the most likely reason I could think of, though the coin doesn’t look it in the picture.

Bobby, does the coin look close to ultra cameo, in hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MarkFeld said:

That would be by far, the most likely reason I could think of, though the coin doesn’t look it in the picture.

Bobby, does the coin look close to ultra cameo, in hand?

It was close Mark. The Rev looks more UC and it looks like the Obverse stopped a little short. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be able to give an answer until I had a coin to evaluate, to be fair I see the star get used more often for toning and as I'm more a red copper (and blast white for silver) collector I rarely am in the position to purchase star coins but do have a few  +  coins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A blast white "Plus" please. 

I'd consider "star" over plus if the coin has complete and even cobalt blue toning.

In general "Plus" over "Star", it's at the high end of the grade (or slightly better). Some people like the "Pluses" for the resubmission game, or have them in case they ever want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Working in an auction venue, the "plus" can add a bit of value to an otherwise-normal coin, but it almost never seems to push it "half way" into the next grade range's value.  The STAR, however... that's a whole different ballgame.  I have seen some coins with a very mundane grade get pushed FAR above the grade-range's typical value.  The best example I can think of might be a common Morgan dollar, say MS-63, that sheets for $75 but sells for $3,000!  Of course, one might say that it was because of the astounding bag toning, but the point is - THAT coin earned a "star" and not a "plus" because of the unfathomable eye-appeal, not because it was "close to MS-64".

In that regard, I believe the "star" is the more desirable designation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James_OldeTowne said:

Working in an auction venue, the "plus" can add a bit of value to an otherwise-normal coin, but it almost never seems to push it "half way" into the next grade range's value.  The STAR, however... that's a whole different ballgame.  I have seen some coins with a very mundane grade get pushed FAR above the grade-range's typical value.  The best example I can think of might be a common Morgan dollar, say MS-63, that sheets for $75 but sells for $3,000!  Of course, one might say that it was because of the astounding bag toning, but the point is - THAT coin earned a "star" and not a "plus" because of the unfathomable eye-appeal, not because it was "close to MS-64".

In that regard, I believe the "star" is the more desirable designation.

I sincerely hope that's right.  I own only one + coin, but quite a few "star" coins. And I bought them all raw  and submitted them myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2020 at 10:40 AM, VKurtB said:

I sincerely hope that's right.  I own only one + coin, but quite a few "star" coins. And I bought them all raw  and submitted them myself.

You're a discriminating collector with good taste. While I have purchased plus grades, I wait now for a whole grade to become available to save me the trouble of upgrading. I have never owned a * but would, if it were warranted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2020 at 6:41 PM, erwindoc said:

Been thinking about this question for some time and I will start by saying that I have been a fan of the NGC star designation for years(check my sets if you don't believe me!).  Unfortunately, I think that the plus grading system has hurt the value of the star.  Points are the same in the registry for a star coin, which is designated for exceptional eye appeal.  The plus is upper ends of the respective grade.  What are your thoughts???  Which would you rather have a "+" or a "*"?  Riding the fence with this dime that has both the plus and star designation...

 

1900.jpg

I'm not sure that it was the plus designation that hurt the star designation, but like you, I have been a fan of the star designation since its inception in the early 2000s, but as of late, it seems rather impossible to get a star out of NGC.  I sent a submission last year where I was expecting anywhere from 5-10 stars.  I got ZERO!!!!  Then they took away the Designation Review service this year so if I wanted to send them back for reconsideration, I would have to submit the coin under the regrade service, pay full price, and get a new serial number.

As for your original question, I typically would choose the star because that relates to eye appeal, but your Barber Dime seems the best way to go, get both the star and the + on the same coin.  Currently, I only have one of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lehigh96 said:

Coincidentally, I just found a coin that this topic applies to.

 

sh0aRzN.jpg

 

Does this Jefferson Nickel deserve a +, *, +*, or nothing at all?

Without knowing the grade that it was given, it is impossible to say whether or not it deserves a plus. But, the toning is pretty enough that I believe it did receive a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

Without knowing the grade that it was given, it is impossible to say whether or not it deserves a plus. But, the toning is pretty enough that I believe it did receive a star.

Good point, it is an MS67

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, it's a "no" on the plus. And, that is not due to what looks like chatter on the cheek and collar. That, I am guessing, is due to the coin not striking up fully. I do, however, think I see enough small tics in the hair, fields, and on Monticello to keep it from getting the plus.

Just my opinion, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no one more unqualified to pass judgment on this coin than I am.  Fortunately, I have Just Bob's observation to rely on and, as everyone knows, he hasn't been far off the mark on things numismatic since 1959.  To be on the safe side, MS-67 does not seem far-fetched.  My problem is an anemic reverse which, as an amateur, I would peg at as MS-66+, if that.  Does the coin deserve a *?  The obverse certainly looks nice but there is nothing on the reverse that I see deserving of such an accolade.  Stars should be reserved for pieces exhibiting exceptional eye-appeal. A lovely war nickel in all respects!

Edited by Quintus Arrius
Decapitalization; add word.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
2 2