Krzycoins Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 (edited) Looks like it was done more than 2 times. Should I send it out for grading? Edited June 28, 2019 by Krzycoins Anyone's opinion would be appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzycoins Posted June 28, 2019 Author Share Posted June 28, 2019 This might be a better picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAULEMALL Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 I want to say yes but it's hard to say.. This is the same area of a different coin that pcgs has graded 1963 D DDO FS-101 Krzycoins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenHolcomb Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 I think you need photos that are straight on instead of from an angle. It is much easier to make a coin look Doubled from an angle and nearly impossible straight on. You obviously can take decent pictures so why do it as you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcesKings Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 The first picture makes it look like a doubled die, the second picture is clear cut MD. (note the misshapen leg in the "R") From that I'd have to side with MD. Krzycoins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohawk Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 I also agree with the assessment of machine doubling. Machine doubling is extremely common on US coins from the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzycoins Posted July 1, 2019 Author Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Mohawk said: I also agree with the assessment of machine doubling. Machine doubling is extremely common on US coins from the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's. Do you think it would be worth grading it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohawk Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Just now, Krzycoins said: Do you think it would be worth grading it? No. Machine doubling adds no value to coins as many collectors actually consider it a form of damage and it is so common. The 1963-D Washington Quarter is also an extremely common coin, even in high grades. If I were you, I'd save my money I hope that helps! Krzycoins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzycoins Posted July 1, 2019 Author Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Mohawk said: No. Machine doubling adds no value to coins as many collectors actually consider it a form of damage and it is so common. The 1963-D Washington Quarter is also an extremely common coin, even in high grades. If I were you, I'd save my money I hope that helps! How about RPM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohawk Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Krzycoins said: How about RPM There may be some 1963-D RPMs that are worth a premium, but I cannot even begin to answer that question without a photo of what you are referring to. It's also possible that what may look to you like an RPM is actually more machine doubling, which is a very common occurrence in coins of this age. I'm also not an expert on Washington Quarter varieties by any means.....I feel that I should throw that disclaimer out there. Krzycoins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzycoins Posted July 1, 2019 Author Share Posted July 1, 2019 Thanks for your time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohawk Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, Krzycoins said: Thanks for your time No problem. Always glad to help out. Krzycoins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
