Which Double Eagle has a different grade?

11 posts in this topic

Of the five 1889 double eagles shown below, four have the same grade while one was graded differently from the others.  Which one is different?  What are the grades?

Hint:  All coins were graded in the mint state range. 





Coin #2



Coin #3



Coin #4



Coin #5


Edited by Coagman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my guess is the first four coins are 62 possibly 63.  That last one probably got 65 maybe 64+, but I would say gem on the last one from what I can see in the photos

Edited by kmag
Link to post
Share on other sites

My grades would be MS-63 for the first three coins and MS-62 for the fourth one. Coin #5 is clearly better than the previous four. From the photos, the minimum grade would be MS-64+ with good shot at MS-65. Finding any of these coins in MS-65, including the very common 1904 double eagle, is not easy. That's why I have hesitated calling it MS-65 with no reservations.

Edited by BillJones
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to Kmag, Walkerfan, BillJones and Numisport for their guesses. 

For Coins #1-4, all guesses were within 1 point of the actual grade assigned by PCGS which was MS63 for Coins #1-4.  The guesses on coin #5 were way off. 

Coin #5 is very puzzling to me, PCGS gave it a grade of MS62, so it is lowest graded among the group.  This 1889 $20 has fewer marks compared with the others and the eye appeal is exceptional in my opinion. 

I think this coin is at least MS63+ or MS64, especially when you compare it to coins of this date in 63 holders.  There are no hairlines or evidence of cleaning or processing.  The surfaces have a mellow appearance with underlying luster, but not the bright monochrome look of a dripped coin.  There are a few areas of discoloration on the obverse around 12 to 1 o’clock, and a small reeding mark near the cheek that is very small by double eagle standards, however, marks of this size are common on MS65 twenties.  I captured several images of the coin and the holder, see below.  I have feeling this example will be not be in a 62 holder for long.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/29/2017 at 9:24 PM, BillJones said:

Maybe they saw a dull spot on Ms. Liberty's cheek, which would make it one of those 62/58 pieces. 

Looking at the various pictures, you might be right. This appears to be one of those AU-62 pieces. 

Which, if we're right, would make it all the more disturbing that the numismatic gods have granted it the CAC sticker! 

Edited by physics-fan3.14
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now