From local auction. Care to guess the price realized?

[toyonakataro]

Hello. I recently saw some seated $ auctioned at Yahoo Japan, whitch is similar to e-bay in U.S.  They were auctioned with no reserve.

Care give your grades on them and guess the price realized?

 

Coin#1  1872 seated $

 

Coin#2   1859-O seated $

 

Coin#3 1876-S Trade $

[kidrootbeer]

not soooo sure about these; would have to see the reeding...

[physics-fan3.14]

22 minutes ago, allmine said:

not soooo sure about these; would have to see the reeding...

If those are fakes, they are really good. Although, to be fair, any raw trade dollar is immediately suspect. 

[physics-fan3.14]

No idea on prices, but grades: 

1: AU

2: AU details, polished and stained

3: AU, but that obverse is ugly

All three of these coins appear to have been cleaned/dipped/mistreated. So, I don't think they should get strong prices (but who knows with online auctions!)

[kidrootbeer]

well, they all have the same surface, and the 72 is weak where it shouldn't be. The Best Way to tell is by looking at the reeding. The Chinese, as of yet, haven't been able to copy it. And, they're becoming reallyreally good at die striking copies

[MarkFeld]

I'd much prefer to be able to examine the coins in hand, before assigning estimated grades. But from what I can see in the images, I'll guess MS64, MS63 and MS63. They look genuine to me.

Edited to add: It's quite possible that what I think to be a combination of luster and haze, is actually cleaning.

[numisport]

Most likely mint state pieces but must have them in hand. Boy I can remember decent AU pieces I could have purchased for 200 bucks back in the seventies.

[kidrootbeer]

The reeding will immediately tell you, but looking at them here, some things don't add up: weak ribbon ends, etc., and the uniform "toning" doesn't do them any favors

[RWB]

The Trade Dollar looks "off" in the photo, but photos are not great for this purpose. Compare the olive branch to an authentic 1876-S.

[kidrootbeer]

my guess is the same process which produced counterfeit dies to double-strike copies of 1964 coinage. I had some: they were verrrrry interrrrrrresting

[toyonakataro]

I really don't know how to grade these coins, but since they are in NNC slabs, it's likely  they won't straight grade in NGC/PCGS holders.

1872 seated $  fetched approx.  $437    Accoring to Heritage auction archive, XF details, cleaned example in PCGS holder fetched $448 recently and this one looks much better.

So, judging from the images alone, I think buyer did well on this coin (although I didn't place bid on this coin)

1859-O realized $1418  According to Heritage Auction, MS62 example in PCGS holder sold for $2115 this month and AU58 sold for less than $1000 recently.

I think the buyer paid too much on this coin.

This trade $ realized $851   According to Heritage auction archive, you can buy one in MS62 in PCGS holder for similar amount of money.  Again, I'm afraid buyer paid too much.

[MarkFeld]

Well, at least, hopefully, they're genuine.

[toyonakataro]

17 minutes ago, MarkFeld said:

Well, at least, hopefully, they're genuine.

I hope so, too.

[Star City Homer]

Some of it might be the photography...hope they work out.

[kidrootbeer]

From the NNC website:
PLEASE NOTE:  We are no longer accepting submissions from Singapore due to the large number of counterfeit coins coming from there.

[kidrootbeer]

I think these slipped through..
OP stated that these were for sale on Yahoo/Japan