Graders use microscope when grade coins?
0

15 posts in this topic

I read a bolg by a Japanese dealer stating how precisely fake coins are made these days.

He says some coins are hard to tell their authenticity without using microscope and that he detected some fake Japanese coins in genuine (PCGS / NGC) slabs.

 

I think I have read somewhere that graders usually grade coins just with their naked eyes, but I may be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taro,

 

I believe that in the very large majority of cases, graders grade with their naked eye or a glass. And that use of a microscope would be extremely rare.

Edited by MarkFeld

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark

According to his opinion, that would mean grading companies would keep on allowing fake coins into their holders, but have you heared about troubles about that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A microscope, or at least a high-powered magnifier, can help immensely in authenticating a coin, for example, to look for an added mintmark. But high magnification is useless for grading. ALL coins look horrible under strong magnification, since tiny, unimportant surface anomalies can look like huge, gaping craters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark, on this subject, given the increases in microprocessor and computing power today vs. 10 years ago -- let alone the 1980's when the TPGs came into existence -- how long do you think it will be before all coins submitted to PCGS or NGC are given an automatic scan that checks metallic content, checks dimensions, strike quality, imperfections, etc ?

 

Not necessarily to grade the coins...but to look for counterfeits. A scanner or analyzer should be able to work 50-100x faster than graders if not more. Once a coin was confirmed as authentic, graders could concentrate on the aesthetics and other gray areas that humans excel at but computers can't do (yet).

Edited by GoldFinger1969

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am nearsighted and do my initial sharpness grading with my naked eyes. I know up front 95% percent of the time if I'm interested in a piece for purchase from my unmagnified inspection. I use a 3X glass now and then for grading, and always use 10X when I'm looking for signs of cleaning and authenticity concerns. The 10X is around my neck, and I use it on everything I'm serious about buying,

 

I have a microscope at home. I use it to get up close when I really want to look at the details, but it's useless for grading. That level of magnification makes EVERY coin look bad.

 

Interestingly enough the ICG grades use a scope at the shows all the time. I couldn't grade that way, but each to their own.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mark

According to his opinion, that would mean grading companies would keep on allowing fake coins into their holders, but have you heared about troubles about that?

 

In some (or most, depends who you talk to) cases, not only is the coin a fake replica but also the very plastic slab containing the coin turns out to be a fake replica...even down to the hologram.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mark

According to his opinion, that would mean grading companies would keep on allowing fake coins into their holders, but have you heared about troubles about that?

 

In some (or most, depends who you talk to) cases, not only is the coin a fake replica but also the very plastic slab containing the coin turns out to be a fake replica...even down to the hologram.

 

Although the leading companies have been fooled by counterfeits in a very small number of well publicized occasions, the vast majority of the time it's been a counterfeit coin in a counterfeit slab.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark, on this subject, given the increases in microprocessor and computing power today vs. 10 years ago -- let alone the 1980's when the TPGs came into existence -- how long do you think it will be before all coins submitted to PCGS or NGC are given an automatic scan that checks metallic content, checks dimensions, strike quality, imperfections, etc ?

 

Not necessarily to grade the coins...but to look for counterfeits. A scanner or analyzer should be able to work 50-100x faster than graders if not more. Once a coin was confirmed as authentic, graders could concentrate on the aesthetics and other gray areas that humans excel at but computers can't do (yet).

 

This would never work. Sounds good though.

The coin entered for the so called analyzer would only deem the same exact coin as genuine. All others with higher grade, lower grade, spots, wear, varieties, doubling and so on --- would be listed as fakes by the analyzer.

Technology at it's finest. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert ! Let me state that right out front !

But I have enjoyed the numismatic hobby for about 45 yrs now .

I normally buy strictly slabbed coins and tend to re-grade them myself.

Using a 7x magnifier and for variety coins like over dates and double dies ,I

might use a 10x. With gradeflation being what it is today. Many of the the currently

slabbed coins do not pass muster of their given grades in my opinion. I'm delighted when I find some that do !

But , alas you know what is said of opinions ! ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This would never work. Sounds good though.

The coin entered for the so called analyzer would only deem the same exact coin as genuine. All others with higher grade, lower grade, spots, wear, varieties, doubling and so on --- would be listed as fakes by the analyzer.

Technology at it's finest. :)

I disagree....if they can program chips to drive cars without people and account for all the variables, they can certainly do that for the myriad of possibilities of grading, defects, marks, cleaning, etc.

 

It wouldn't even have to be fool-proof. But on lower-$$$ coins, it would be a nice speedy way to assist the graders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything on Amazon or a coin site regarding 3x, 5x, and 10x magnifyers that you vets swear by ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Bausch and Lomb Hastings 10X. They are expensive, but once you own one and take care of it, you won't need another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried them all and used most. The Eschenbach Precision Folding Magnifier (3x + 6x = 9x) suits me best. I use the 3x religiously

 

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mark

According to his opinion, that would mean grading companies would keep on allowing fake coins into their holders, but have you heared about troubles about that?

 

Taro, I have not heard much about counterfeit coins making it into holders and I don't know if the opinion you heard is something to be concerned about, or not. Hopefully it isn't and won't be a problem in the future.

CAHokie likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0