An interesting progression....
0

24 posts in this topic

It looks like a solid 65 to me. The UNC details grade does not make sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The possibility that the toning was anything other than natural never entered my mind. I took a pretty good lose on that coin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What on earth did PCGS see that was questionable about that toning? Were they smoking the mary jane and seeing things that weren't there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And it has a CAC sticker, now, too! :acclaim::P

 

FWIW, I see nothing wrong with that coin. (shrug)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a loss someone took on that if it went from the ICG slab to a genuine details PCGS slab

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Afterword just indicated the coin was his when it was removed from the IGC holder and then received the details grade. Those are tough and would have been worth another try.

 

Just proves that they don't always get them right ATS either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PCGS probably saw the ICG slab and had to waive their big d*** around to s***on the little crappy tpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PCGS probably saw the ICG slab and had to waive their big d*** around to s***on the little crappy tpg

 

and yes I realize the biological logic hole of that statement :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cracked it out and sent it in raw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope your losses were minimal. If the grade doesn't fit, you should resubmit... and maybe resubmit again depending on the value at stake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I considered trying NGC, but I thought PCGS might know something I did not know concerning the toning and decided not to risk losing anymore money than I already lost. You cannot win every time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The coin looks a little different in color. That could be because of the images or an acetone bath. In the future, I would rinse coins like this in a bath of acetone before resubmitting. If acetone was unsuccessful, I would use a very light in dip in diluted dip solution. I am so sorry for your loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I cracked it out and sent it in raw.

 

Don't underestimate the PCGS sniffer. It can pick up ICG slab molecules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be beyond pissed!! Shame on PCGS for missing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont see anything wrong with that one either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quantity of errors in authentication squared is proportional to the velocity of examination.

 

E^2 ∝ vt

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The color looks weird to me. But then again, many Peace dollars in slabs have weird color.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Questionable Color means just that...the toning is suspect but cannot be proven to be natural, so it gets rejected. It's the 'better safe than sorry' syndrome.

 

May not be right, but toned Peace dollars get extra scrutiny at the big top tier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes you get the bulll sometimes you get the horns

 

mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, come to think of it with the widgets I handle There have been a handful of re-submissions and in every case the grade came back different than the grade prior to the crack out.

 

Some were higher, some lower. All had a reason for the crack out. The point is, different day, different results are possible.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The possibility that the toning was anything other than natural never entered my mind. I took a pretty good lose on that coin.

 

Did you send to PCGS yourself, or did it go through greatcollections raw submission?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The possibility that the toning was anything other than natural never entered my mind. I took a pretty good lose on that coin.

 

Did you send to PCGS yourself, or did it go through greatcollections raw submission?

 

 

 

The latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0