Well Struck, PL 88-s

[Red Llama]

88-s.

Go at it.

[coinman_23885]

AU58 not even close to PL.

[Red Llama]

This one was a test guys.

This coin was first one of the lot I sent it. I pick it up Tuesday.

Came back 62 PL.

 

[Coindude]

I was thinking 62 at best, not PL. congrats.

[Red Llama]

I think pictures are tad hard to show PL.

I have a DPL (PCGS can call it DMPL all they want) 82-cc I'll show you guys. It is only a 64 but the reflection is insane on it. If there was ever time for a ultra-deep mirror 'ranking it would be with this coin.

[coinman_23885]

This one was a test guys.

This coin was first one of the lot I sent it. I pick it up Tuesday.

Came back 62 PL.

 

Maybe it is the images, but the dark discoloration on the eagle's breast makes me think that this is a slider AU.

[Red Llama]

Yeah sorry for pics guys. It is a balancing act as want to get close enough to show as many marks as possible but at same time get too close and I get a dark coin.

[physics-fan3.14]

Judging solely from teh obverse pics, I'd call it 62 max and not even close to PL. I understand that PL surfaces are very hard to capture in photo's though, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one.

[Red Llama]

It already came back 62 PL

[slcoin]

I'd like to see it in the holder. I think 62 is fair, but it's hard to imagine PL by the posted pics. Not saying it didn't come back that way but a different angle may lend additional understanding.

[Red Llama]

Hope to pick it up tomorrow.

I do think pictures do not do it justice

[mtnstyne]

did they photo it at the TPG? You could post the cert # and we could view it there.

[Red Llama]

I think they photo it all. I pick it up from the dealer. Got call on Sat about it but of course no shipping on Memorial Day

[yonico]

I can see 62, but PL really surprises me. Would never guess it from the obverse pic.Might be the pics though