1882-O Nothing special, but all invited to give their thoughts...

[TheCount]

Only thing I will say is that the gold toning is much lighter than in the picture.

 

 

[Coindude]

Looks to be a 63, possibly 62. The mirrors will exaggerate the field imperfections. Definitely PL... and I'm really at DMPL actually. nice coin with nice periphery toning.

[cpm9ball]

Nice! You might want to check the diagnostics on the VAMWorld site. There are some with the mintmark tilted left.

 

Chris

[Mark T]

I like this coin and would grade it at least MS 63 PL with a good shot at a 64 and maybe even 65. What would hold this back are those marks on the reverse -I can not tell from your photo if they are grazes or something more defined.

As for a DMPL - no way to tell from the photo .

 

I messed with your photo a bit .

[L1ncolnF4n]

Looks 64/65DMPL to me

[TheCount]

thanks MarkT, good photoshop work, thats just about what the coin actually looks like.

[relicsncoins]

64 PL or DMPL. Nice Coin!!!

[gbsten]

Really nice strike for a New Orleans, especially the hair! The mirrors tend to show every defect and that still looks clean, I'd say 65 at least. The one problem I have (which I'm probably wrong because no one else has commited) is the color and pattern of the toning. Almosts looks like there could be some dip residue? Still, a very nice keeper!

[TheCount]

thanks for all the feedback, learned a lot today.

[jgrinz]

63 DMPL

 

Typical field hash - nice frost in general except for the smudge on the cheek ...

Might squeek a 64 depending on reflectivity

 

Nice Coin I like it

[TomB]

Lots of light chatter in the fields, but it looks pretty darn nice overall. I would venture MS62 or MS63 with PL.