• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

robec1347

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    5,032
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by robec1347

  1. On 4/9/2024 at 8:27 AM, RWB said:

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1094653/1910-reverse-of-1909-class-iii-transitional-lincoln-wheat-cent

    A message thread on the PCGS board includes this comment:

    "Peace1 Posts: 39 ✭✭✭

    @robec said:
    I suppose then also any 1909 VDB with the dot between the D and B closer to the B will be Barber’s version since that only occurs on reverses where the N in UNITED is deep cut.

    "Barber’s reverse has the dot between D and B closest to the D. Brenner’s reverse the dot is centered."

    This is incorrect. ALL the reverse hubs with "V.D.B" were made by Charles Barber. Brenner's hub had  "Brenner" in the same position. This was rejected and Barber merely replaced  "Brenner"  with the initials. (See Renaissance of American Coinage 1909-1915 for details and photos.)

    I’m not sure whose design is which. My response supposing that Barber’s version differs Brenner’s was based solely on the fact there are two versions of the VDB reverse, one with the filled N and centered dot between the D and B and one with the deep cut N and the dot closer to the D. Peace1 attributed Barber with one and Brenner with the other. If Barber was the creator of both I’m fine with that. Both versions exist with the Philadelphia coin.  The San Francisco version only come with the filled N, centered dot. 
    DD2FDE8C-BA4B-41EE-827C-7792E51F0197.thumb.jpeg.9273a0840098279c5bdfacf5a86a1474.jpeg1B7C90D0-2DBA-4489-AAE1-8BEE31FEAF4A.thumb.jpeg.3a6ee9e0d40dbe6ffdb2c504a68f361a.jpeg