• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

SHOEDT1

Member
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Wanted to make sure this request did not fall through the cracks, as I did not see an acknowledgement, so I apologize for being duplicative. In addition to the existing Barbados 1973-1997 proof 5C, $1, and $2 sets, I respectfully request that you add the following three sets to the NGC Registry: Barbados, Cent, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-001) Barbados, 10 Cents, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-003) Barbados, 25 Cents, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-004) Thanks for the consideration. SWH
  2. In addition to the existing Barbados 1973-1997 proof 5C, $1, and $2 sets, I respectfully request that you add the following three sets to the NGC Registry: Barbados, Cent, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-001) Barbados, 10 Cents, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-003) Barbados, 25 Cents, 1973-1997, Proof (2867398-004) Thanks for the consideration. SWH
  3. I second the request for a multi-denominational set: British Virgin Islands, Marine Life Coinage, 1985, Complete Proof This approach would cover both the silver and base metal proof sets issued in 1985.
  4. Ugh. I hope the team will reconsider this. I have an inventory of these that have been in my pipeline to send that now need to be reconsidered whether or not it is worth the trouble when only the denomination sets are in play.
  5. Hello, Ali! I would like to request the creation of the following denomination set, with my applicable cert number found below: Bahamas, Copper-Nickel $1, 1981-1985, Proof 2857083-012 Currently a denomination set exists for the 1981-1985 Proof $2 coins, but there is not one for either the $1 or 50 Cent coins that were also produced in copper-nickel during this same time period. Thanks for the consideration!
  6. Hello, Ali! I would like to request the creation of the following denomination set, with my applicable cert number found below: Belize, Copper-Nickel $1, 1974-1984, Proof 2857083-013 Thanks for the consideration!
  7. I would echo this request and also suggest amending it as follows: Bahamas, Flamingo $2 Type Set, 1966-1996, Complete This Flamingo type set is a popular one in the collector community, which could translate well to the registry, and was discussed in CoinWorld a number of years ago: https://www.coinworld.com/news/precious-metals/flock-of-flamingos-possible-for-type-set.html Perhaps most importantly, adding this type set to the registry would provide a home for the present population of nineteen NGC graded gold coins (Bahamas 1995 G$2) which currently have no place in the registry due to the fact that they are the only G$2 denomination coins issued by the Bahamas, and hence do not qualify for a denomination set. I own the following Flamingo $2 cert numbers and am currently waiting on the delivery of a 1995 G$2 coin: 2855221-008, 2855223-011, 2855222-008 A couple of the KM slots could be open to debate, but I see the following as possible for this type set: KM #9 SILVER MS, KM #9 SILVER PF, KM #23 SILVER MS, KM #23 SILVER PF, KM #66 COPPER-NICKEL MS, KM #66a SILVER PF, KM #66b COPPER-NICKEL PF, KM #66c SILVER ??, KM #105 COPPER-NICKEL PF, KM #187 GOLD PF, KM #203 SILVER PF Thanks for the consideration!
  8. Hello, Ali! I would like to request the creation of the following two Lunar Series sets, with my applicable cert numbers found below: Belarus, Silver 20 Roubles, Lunar Series, 2012-2023, Proof 2855220-002 Kazakhstan, Silver 500 Tenge, Lunar Series, 2011-2022, Proof 2855220-001 Thanks!
  9. They don't belong with the historical series and they are not true commemoratives, but they will still be popular with modern collectors. Put them in their own short set.
  10. Hello Ali! Please consider my request to add a new set for the Cayman Islands: Silver $1, Marlin Series, 2017-Date, Mint State. The set should currently have four slots. The slots and my corresponding cert numbers are found below: Silver $1, Marlin Series, 2017-Date, Mint State 2017 Marlin 2850706-013 2018 Marlin 2850706-014 2019 Marlin 2850706-015 2020 Marlin 2850704-015 Best regards, Stephen
  11. The NGC set registry currently has one denomination set for the British Caribbean Territories: 25 Cents, 1955-1965, Proof https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive/british-caribbean-territories/eastern-caribbean-territories/4483/ I respectfully request that you please add the following additional six missing denomination sets, which would complete the run of BCT proof issues. My applicable cert numbers are listed beneath the requested sets. Half Cent, 1955-1958, Proof 2848900-002 Cent, 1955-1965, Proof 2848900-003 2852422-001 2 Cents, 1955-1965, Proof 2848900-005 2852422-002 5 Cents, 1955-1965, Proof 2848900-006 2852422-003 10 Cents, 1955-1965, Proof 2848900-007 2852422-004 50 Cents, 1955-1965, Proof 2848900-010 2852422-006
  12. Given that the "1974 Proof Set" registry set category looks to be a one-off and I have had other Caribbean single year proof sets rejected for registry consideration, the following alternative might make sense for the BVI in particular: British Virgin Islands, Silver Type Set, 1973-1985, Complete (encompassing coinage from all three silver proof sets, all silver coinage from specimen sets and proof sets, as well as S$10, S$20 and S$25 Franklin Mint issues) One could easily be constructed for the non-silver issues, as well, if desired. There is precedent in the registry for Caribbean type sets: https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive/british-caribbean-territories/eastern-caribbean-territories/5047/
  13. Thanks for the thoughtful feedback! I sent a message directly to the other member, who hopefully won't take offense. His set in question has 10,000 points, over 2,000 of which come from the mislabeled coin. It will still have a 6,000 point advantage over the second best one in the category, so I can't see a reason why someone would not want to have the correct label fixed by NGC due to mechanical error. I have bought coins before knowing there was an error label and have sent them down to Tampa for correction without issue.