TON Collection

7 minutes ago, TON Collection said:

Just now, TON Collection said:

Thanks greenstang Appreciate your honesty and I know I know about the pictures that’s my fault I should’ve known betterAppreciate your honesty and I know I know about the pictures that’s my fault I should’ve known better that was a greenhorn move

2 hours ago, Greenstang said:

After seeing the new and better pictures, (Wish they had been posted earlier)  I'm changing my original assessment.  It looks like a nice Delamination covering half the coin.

Thanks greenstang Appreciate your honesty andI know I know I should’ve known better about the pictures the quality sucked first that was a greenhorn move

26 minutes ago, Coinbuf said:

At first I was set on pmd, but the newer photos look very much like a lamination error.

Cool I hope your right. Appreciate your input

Yes and the penny is not bent it feels and looks raised.

Is this post mint error? 

Now this cent is very similar to the ones under pcgs coin app. It has the flat edges and same features seems i could maybe have a match. Am i way off?  

is it just me or does it look like there is a noose around the lincoln sitting in chair?

13 hours ago, Greenstang said:

You should really take it out of the 2x2 when shooting to cut down on the glare.

All I can see from those photos is some DDD on the date. Is there somewhere else you think there is doubling?

no it just looked odd. I thought of mint set haze or something 

is this a cent planchet error

Lol

Does this have a chance at getting the special proof designation?As described by heritage auctions and PDFs has the brown flecks with sharp red brick color

Just now, TON Collection said:

Look at the reverse of this Indian head the letter  E in the word CENT and the obverse has the repunched date as well. IS this not a double die reverse?

Look at the reverse of this Indian head the letter  E in the word CENT and the obverse has the repunched date as well. IS this not a double die reverse?