• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

jgrinz

Member: Seasoned Veteran
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,904

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jgrinz

  1. jgrinz
    Yep its a clunker ...
  2. jgrinz
    No Fluorescent which is a little difficult to work with white balance and shadowing but as you can see is workable. Newer ones MAY BE BETTER but the price is too. I think you can find these used for like 14 bux or so
  3. jgrinz
    You will find lighting in ONE direction will not be adequate … Especially proof or Proof like coins But good luck can wait to see your pictures
  4. jgrinz
    They are older ones Ott lights - OTL13TCG My phone is an OLD LG G4 believe or not.
  5. jgrinz
    Not really a sought after OR desired coin anomaly This type of mint error is pretty common
  6. jgrinz
    You should leave this type of question on the NGC board Questions for NGC can be put here
  7. jgrinz
    Doesn't look like it anyway
  8. jgrinz
    Yes Coinbuf is correct as far as direct crossovers
  9. jgrinz
    Still got 2 ott lights and use them daily. On close ups you still have a fluorescent float but otherwise still good. Taken with 2 OTTS on either side and Picture taken in the middle with my PHONE :-)
  10. jgrinz
    Anything that is not securely encapsulated is a problem waiting to happen ( switch outs etc ) NOT considered a WORLD WIDE top tier grading service. "ICCS encases coins in an inert (Polyethylene Terephthalate) envelope and is then sealed in a plastic flip. The ICCS grading certificate is sealed in the other side of the flip"
  11. jgrinz
    Owning one of each coin - I agree with BOTH grades and outcomes. Still desirable pieces even in Details slabs
  12. jgrinz
    Yeah with these pictures it looks like a VAM-11 Better pictures would help but it looks like: Near date - O/CC high shifted left
  13. jgrinz
    yep
  14. jgrinz
    Yeah not a big difference considering the base weight of his 21 morgan which is WAY under.
  15. jgrinz
    ALL XF-AU in my book but all very desirable Nice set
  16. jgrinz
    Take a real one and this one and drop on a table you will notice a distinct ring difference of the coin
  17. jgrinz
  18. jgrinz
    Without exceptionally better pictures - Just call it a VAM-2 Large "S" Upright and centered Date is not doubled just a break in the tone around the date AND give it away
  19. jgrinz
    Silver plated pot metal Its fake
  20. jgrinz
    Lot of cleaned coins there also Looks like your loved one enjoyed coins. Sorry for their passing.
  21. jgrinz
    I mean really Mark - Who says that anymore :-) Actually I thought you were kind of a poppycock kind a guy
  22. jgrinz
    Yeah that coin was hammered pretty badly not just with your 'cleaning' but also previous to you owning it. Too bad too its a 1878 7TF '79 Rev
  23. jgrinz
    :-) Yeah I know hehe Tried to slide one by you but I knew you would catch me
  24. jgrinz
    @Ratzie33 Stop buying from James Toliver If its not holdered 99% of the time it cannot be.
  25. jgrinz
    Yes - but that's not one sorry