• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

LINCOLNMAN

Member
  • Posts

    586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by LINCOLNMAN

  1. I find it rather silly that a distinction is made between counterfeits made in Colonial times in the US and those made in England. I have a nice British GIII halfpenny in my collection that was produced in England at the same time Machin's Mills and other US counterfeiters were operating. I collected it as part of my Colonials. I couldn't find anyone except SEGS to slab it and they put all sorts of warnings on the slab  Absurd. . 

  2. Thanks for the advice above. The coin in question is listed on eBay. I don't have the skills to provide a link, but it is a 2 escudo piece minted in Chile, 1794. The dealer has fairly limited experience on eBay and a no return policy. I've expanded my type set to include examples of foreign coins that circulated in the Colonies and early US. Looking for one example minted in Chile, any denomination. The 8 escudos is readily available slabbed, but much more pricey than the referenced example. Lots of fun identifying and finding these early coins. But tough to find slabbed examples of many early foreign coin types, especially cheaper coins, else I wouldn't consider this. Should probably have stayed raw, but too far along to turn back.  

  3. I'm considering a foreign gold coin graded by the Canadian company CCCS. Does anyone have any familiarity with this outfit? I've read that a competing Canadian service, ICCS, is reliable, but I also read that ICCS only grades the obverse. I will be crossing to NGC for set consistency and would hope for reasonable grading consistency. Many thanks.  

  4. My preference would be to assign a grade based solely on the state of preservation and strike, what I think is called, in part anyway, a "technical grade". The more subjective determinants of market price should depend on the taste of the buyer. This is what happens anyway, judging by the divergent prices realized for coins of similar grades at similar times in similar venues. This will never happen of course because most people want to be told what is "good" in all fields of life. Furthermore we have the moronic chase for registry status, which is based solely on a TPG grade, now with a CAC opinion thrown in (brilliant marketing schemes BTW). 

  5. On 4/8/2022 at 5:46 PM, Just Bob said:

    Don't care for the moniker, since the bison actually has four legs, but one has been polished away. Don't think a coin struck by an over polished die is worth a premium just because someone came up with a name for it, either. But, I don't control the market or collectors' tastes, so to each his/her own. It definitely is not my place to define another's collecting preferences.

    Agree. Vastly overpriced and overrated IMO. Also agree regarding most variety names; however, I make an exception for colonials. Provided that some modern marketeer hasn't dreamed it up. 

  6. On 3/9/2022 at 11:49 AM, Just Bob said:

    I haven't shopped for a copy lately, but I have to admit that I am surprised you found one that easily. Copies of that book have been scarce in the past. I was actually going to reply and wish you good luck in your hunt. Congrats on scoring one so quickly.

    Excellent reference including a great deal about US coinage acts up to 1857, the history of these coins and federal coins as well. Focuses solely on legal tender coinage addressed by congress from 1793 (silver and gold), so it is limited if one is collecting copper or coins less frequently used, particularly earlier than 1793. Eric Newman contributed. Can't believe this is new to me, should have been part of my library. I've already added a couple of coins to my want list. These are coins addressed as legal tender but I would guess not encountered with regularity "in the wild". English crown and 8 escudos or "doubloon" (according to official documents). 

  7. On 3/8/2022 at 12:00 PM, RWB said:

    If you concentrate on coins used by merchants, your should be able to establish a reasonable boundary. Cons used by the general public, would, of course, be different and exclude most gold.

    Good advice, thanks Roger. Amazon is sending me Shilkie and Solomon today (small miracle and thanks again Bob). Should give me lots of clues if sources are documented.